PACKET PEEPER MAC REVIEW FULL
Are you looking to support a full byod infrastructure with posture and mdm integration? Also what are your expectations as far as support. In the end you have to weigh your options when it comes to your business requirements and yiur network demands.
PACKET PEEPER MAC REVIEW LICENSE
You can view how users are gaining access through your network whether that is vpn wired or wireless.Īlso ise is designed to grow with your network so if you have plans on building a wireless infrastructure you can start with the base features, or better yet obtain the iso that comes with a 90 day base and advanced license that can be run on a virtual machine so you can see it alongside the packetfence. One of the main features of ise is the view that you get with dashboard and the troubleshooting ease thay comes with this software. This is my observation without an understanding of packet fence, I apologize for this being one sided. And I can only get posture support if I have an inline node everywhere that I have an AP? So based on the above the ISE is not able to offer me profiling services or CoA. WLCs do not currently support MAC Authentication Bypass (MAB)." Profiling services are currently supported for 802.1X-authenticated WLANs only on the WLC with CoA support. Autonomous AP deployments (no WLC) also require deployment of an Inline Posture Node for posture support. Use of Inline Posture Node requires WLC version 7.0.98 or later.
/sb10067387c-001-56a6a56c3df78cf7728f9192.jpg "packet peeper mac review")
WLCs prior to release 7.0.116.0 do not support CoA and require deployment of an ISE Inline Posture Node to support posture services. "Wireless LAN Controllers (WLCs) do not support downloadable ACLs (dACLs), but support named ACLs. So since I have an AP1141 this seems to mean that I would be as well to go with Packet Fence as the best I will get from either solution is basic 802.1x authentication?įootnote number 4 on Table 1 of this document seems to cover most of the limitations:. I am also looking at the same options and I was heading entirely in the ISE direction until I realised that there is not full support for non-WLC WiFi systems.
0 kommentar(er)
